Senate Hearing On Dangerous and Potentially Fatal Errors Within The Methods of Vaccine Distribution
Dr. Phillip Buckhaults, one of the biochemists in South Carolina who developed the saliva tests for Covid, recently spoke at a senate hearing about the problems surrounding *the distribution* of the vaccines. He argued, after randomly testing the remaining substances from nearly empty vials, that the product which was approved in test facilities was then changed for distribution in a way that can permanently harm people, if not kill them.
He advocated for more stringent quality control on the state level, and to have someone who is empowered enough to say “no” to the feds when it comes to distribution of the Covid vaccines. He also hinted at the difficulty one will encounter when trying to publish negative results in scientific journals, as one example of how factual information can be corrupted. He claimed that his attempts to contact the FDA were unsuccessful. EDIT: He is followed by Dr. Janci Lindsay, a toxicologist who explains why she thinks this method is “nefarious” without a shadow of a doubt. There is also an effective powerpoint presentation by Dr. Robert Jackson, a family doctor.
I will paste the Youtube transcript below:
0:00
so a little bit of what am I doing here for those of you
0:06
don’t don’t know me um my name is Philip baltz I’m a uh I have a PhD in
0:11
Biochemistry and molecular biology uh I’m a I’m a cancer Gene jock uh basically I do cancer genomics research
0:18
at the University of South Carolina and what that means is that I’m kind of an expert on all the ways that the human
0:24
genome can get fussed with during your lifetime and which of those things cause cancer and which one don’t okay um so
0:32
technically that means that I’m very very skilled in in the art of DNA sequencing okay I can figure out the
0:38
sequence of things that I didn’t know what I was looking for um and I’m also pretty good when I say I I mean the
0:44
people in my laboratory that you’re not going to hear their names but there’s a group of people that do this excellent work um we’re really good at at um
0:52
detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they’re not supposed to be even if they’re real low levels and we
1:00
used those skills during the pandemic um to we invented the covid test that many
1:07
of you did a spit test okay that came out of my lab because we were really good at that kind of stuff and so I’ve
1:13
earned a fair amount of respect um in the state of South Carolina and in this
1:19
body because we did a ton of covid testing in the middle of the night when people were afraid and we told them no
1:25
you don’t have covid in your home or yes you do so my qualif ation to comment on
1:31
this are both Technical and kind of relational in the state of South Carolina
1:41
um I’ll cut to a very narrow theme here but it does touch on lots of these
1:46
regulatory issues and I’ll leave it to you to expand on those if you want to
1:52
I’ll try to stay in this Narrow Lane um of some problems in the fizer vaccine um
1:58
as a case study for place in which regulatory oversight could be improved all right
2:04
so first of all let me say that my interpretation of the literature is that
2:09
the fizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping people from dying but it did a terrible job of stopping the pandemic
2:16
the early Publications showed that um it stopped infection but that only lasted
2:22
for like a month Dr B could you pull the mic a little closer to you um staff’s telling me they having trouble getting
2:28
you on the recording okay okay thank you um in in my professional evaluation of
2:34
the literature the fiser vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping people out of the cemetery but it sucked at stopping
2:39
the pandemic and um it was the best of sucky options that we had and I still
2:46
believe that um it was deployed mostly in good faith but there
2:53
were a lot of shortcuts taken because the house was on fire and uh we could do a better job next time time from the
3:00
lessons that we’re going to learn here that’s my own personal view of this uh but I’m also my philosophical bent here
3:07
is I’m sure many of you have heard of a aam’s Razer right choose the simplest of explanations well there’s another one
3:13
called hanlon’s Razer which is never attribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence and so
3:19
I’m trying to be gracious here in many in circumstances there could be malice underneath but I’m trying to see just
3:25
incompetence to be gracious so the fizer uh vaccine is contaminated with plasma
3:32
DNA it’s not just mRNA it’s got bits of DNA in it this DNA is the DNA Vector
3:40
that was used um as the template for the invitro transcription reaction when they made the
3:45
MRNA um I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab the vials of
3:51
fiser vaccine that were given out here in Colombia uh one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in
3:57
the College of Pharmacy and for reasons that I still don’t understand he kept every single vial um so he had a whole
4:04
freezer full of the empty vials well the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them he gave them all to me and I looked at them we had two
4:11
batches that were given out here in Colombia and I checked these two batches and I checked them by
4:18
sequencing and I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine and I can see what’s in there and it’s surprising that
4:24
there’s any DNA in there and you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there and I’m kind of alarmed about
4:32
the possible consequences of this both in terms of human health and biology but
4:38
you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there so this DNA in my
4:45
view it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death
4:50
from Cardiac Arrest there’s a lot of cases now um of people having suspicious
4:57
death after vaccine it’s hard to prove what caused it it’s just you know temporally Associated um and this DNA is
5:05
a plausible mechanism okay uh this DNA
5:10
uh can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got
5:16
transfected with the vaccine mix this is just the way it works we do this in the lab all the time we take pieces of DNA
5:22
we mix them up with a A lipid complex like the fizer uh vaccine is in we pour it onto cells and and a lot of it gets
5:29
into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell it’s not
5:35
just a temporary um a temporary thing it is in that cell and all of its progyny
5:40
from now on forever more amen so that’s why I’m kind of alarmed
5:45
about this DNA being in the vaccine it’s it’s it’s different from RNA because it
5:50
can be permanent this is a real Hazard for genome modification of Long Live sematic
5:56
cells like stem cells um and it could cause theoretically this is all a
6:01
theoretical concern but it’s pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology that it could cause a sustained
6:08
autoimmune tact toward that tissue it’s also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people depending
6:15
on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands um it can interrupt a
6:20
tumor suppressor or activate an enogen I think it’ll be rare but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough
6:26
that we are to figure out if this is happening or not and then again the the the autoimmunity
6:33
thing is not my wheelhouse I’m not an immunologist but the cancer risk is that’s my bag I know this is a thing and
6:39
it is a possibility okay A little nerdy science
6:45
here the central dogma of molecular biology is that DNA gets transcribed into RNA okay and then RNA gets
6:53
translated into protein this is just how life runs why why does this matter well DNA
7:01
for the purposes of this discussion DNA is a longlived information storage
7:06
device okay what you were born with you’re going to die with and pass on to your kids DNA lasts for hundreds of
7:12
thousands of years um and it can last for Generations if you and get pass it on to your kids right so alterations to
7:19
the DNA they stick around RNA by its nature is temporary it doesn’t last and that
7:28
feature of RNA was part of the sales pitch for the vaccine the pseudo iDine
7:33
was supposed to make the RNA last a little bit longer but still it’s a transient phenomenon we’re talking hours
7:39
to days okay um and then proteins once proteins are made they also don’t last
7:45
forever they they last for hours to days but something that makes its way into DNA has the potential to last for a very
7:52
long time maybe a lifetime so this is a picture of the
7:57
sequencing read that uh the sequencing run that I did uh in the lab um from a
8:02
couple of batches of the fiser vaccine and all those little bitty lines here are the little tiny pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine they don’t belong
8:09
there they are not part of the sales pitch or the marketing campaign and they’re there there’s a lot of them this
8:16
little graph here in the middle is the size distribution it Peaks around 100 base pairs 120 base pairs so the the DNA
8:24
pieces that are in the vaccine are short little pieces 100 120 there’s some that
8:29
are about 500 base pairs a few that are even 5,000 but most of them are around 100 base
8:35
pairs um why is this important because the probability of a
8:42
DNA piece of DNA integrating into the human genome is unrelated to its size so
8:49
your genome risk is just a function of how many particles there are so it’s like you know if you shoot a shotgun at
8:56
a washboard if you shoot a slug you have some probability of hitting it and if shoot Buckshot you have a bigger
9:02
probability of hitting it with some shot right this all these little pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine are
9:07
analogous to Buckshot um you have many many thousands of opportunities to
9:14
modify uh a uh cell of a vaccinated person um the
9:20
pieces are very small because during the process they chopped them up to try to make them go away but they actually
9:26
increased the hazard of genome modification in the process that’s how this got
9:32
here um in my view uh somebody should go
9:37
about sequencing DNA samples from stem cells of people who are vaccinated and find
9:44
out if this theoretical risk has happened or not I
9:49
think this is a real serious oversight regulatory oversight that happened at the federal level and somebody should
9:56
force this to happen somewhere Dr B if you now are you capable of doing that
10:01
yeah it’s we do that kind of thing but in order for it to be trustworthy it by the public this has to be done by lots
10:08
of people right okay um I’ll talk to you more about that later yeah this is our our deal this is why I know this should
10:14
have been done at the federal level okay um so we took all these pieces of
10:21
DNA and we used them to glue together what the source DNA must have been this
10:27
is kind of again this is our what we do in the lab all the time and and all these little little red and green lines
10:33
here these are all independent little pieces of DNA um this must have had 100,000 pieces of DNA in this this
10:39
sequencing run and you can put them all back together and see what they came from is this circle over here it’s a
10:46
plasmid that you can go shopping online to buy from agilant and it’s clear that
10:53
fiser uh took this plasmid and then they Clon Spike into it um and
10:59
they used it for in a process called invitro transcription translation inv vitro transcription where you
11:06
feed an RNA polymerase this plasmid and it makes a whole bunch of mRNA copies for you okay and then you take this mRNA
11:14
you mix it with the the lipid nanoparticle transection reagent and now you’ve got your mRNA vaccine but they
11:19
failed to get the DNA out before they did this so these little pieces they did they did make some effort to chop it up
11:26
so all these little pieces of the plasma got packaged in with the RNA that’s clear as day what happened just from the
11:32
forensics of looking at the DNA sequencing okay A little bit of a regulatory note here
11:39
um the way you do RNA transcription in vitro transcription reactions you have
11:45
to give it a DNA template okay and you can give it a DNA template that is just
11:51
a synthetic piece of DNA that is only the instructions to make the RNA and that’s what was done for getting
11:59
the um emergency use authorization and the clinical trial it’s called process one if you look up that kind of stuff um
12:06
they made a PCR product of just the bits that they wanted and then they did the invitro transcription made a bunch of
12:11
RNA of that there was no plasma DNA to contaminate the stuff that was used for
12:16
the trial but that that making that PCR product doesn’t scale the way that was
12:22
necessary to vaccinate the whole world so a cheaper way to scale up the production of this template is to clone
12:29
that PCR product into this plasma Vector put the plasma Vector into bacteria and then you grow up big Vats of the
12:35
bacteria they make a lot of the plasma DNA for you then you use that plasma DNA as the template to drive this
12:40
transcription reaction to make your RNA um and that’s where how the
12:47
contamination ended up in the production batches even though it was not in the stuff that was used for the
12:55
authorization trials so I know it’s a little bit of nerdy science but it has
13:00
regulatory implications for for you
13:06
guys um we can we can measure the quantity of this stuff pretty easy in the lab this
13:13
is we’re we’re good at doing this kind of stuff this is the same we made a little PC a colleague of mine at at MIT
13:19
made you know from who who used to work for the the broad Institute at MIT he he
13:25
made a little uh PCR test and we cloned here this is similar to the PCR test
13:31
that you all took for the spit test okay same same idea and same expertise behind it and we can quantify exactly how much
13:38
of this stuff is in a vaccine or any other tissue and you know I estimate that there were
13:46
about two billion copies of the one piece that we’re looking for in every
13:52
dose and if you looked back at that map I showed you where it’s all these little
13:57
the the little piece that we’re looking for is just that little bit right there okay but if you see 2 billion copies of
14:04
this there’s about 200 billion of everything else so what this means is
14:11
that there’s probably about 200 billion pieces of this plasma
14:16
DNA in in each dose of the vaccine and it’s encapsulated in this
14:22
lipid nanop particle so it’s ready to be delivered inside the cell okay this is a bad
14:31
idea my conclusions from this um we should check a bunch of people
14:39
ah my conclusions from this are I should learn how to run PowerPoint um we should check a bunch of
14:46
vaccinated people getting tissue samples especially if we focus on harmed
14:53
people but that’s not necessary we could also just focus on regular unharmed people people and see if this plasma DNA
15:01
is integrating into the genomes of any of their stem cells it leaves a calling card that is there one of the reasons
15:09
why I’m focusing on this is because it’s kind of different from a lot of the other imagined harms where
15:15
you can’t really prove it you can be suspicious because of the timing but you can’t really prove it this one you can
15:20
prove it because it leaves a calling card okay um you find it in the stem cells of
15:27
harmed people it’s equivalent to finding a certain type of lid in someone who is now dead
15:34
it’s pretty reasonable to assume that that’s what caused it uh the Royal we meaning you guys
15:41
should insist that the FDA Force fizer to get the DNA out of the
15:48
booster and all future versions of this vaccine I’m a real fan of this platform
15:54
okay I think it has the potential to treat cancers I really
15:59
believe that this platform is revolutionary and in your lifetime there
16:04
will be mRNA vaccines against antigens in your unique cancer okay and but they
16:11
got to get this problem fixed okay and I and I right now I think the financial incentives are too great to just keep on
16:18
rolling with it and it’s going to take some encouragement to get it
16:25
out the regulation that allowed this DNA to there in the first place I don’t think that this the amounts there
16:31
actually exceed the regulation limits in some batches it may in in the
16:37
two batches that I looked at one of them it was just under the limit and one it was just over the limit my colleague in
16:43
Boston has looked at a fair number of other batches and there’s a handful that are super high and there’s a handful
16:48
that are super low but the fact that there is a regulatory threshold for
16:53
amount of DNA allowed in a vaccine is a throwback to an Era when we
16:59
were talking about vaccines that were like a recombinant protein that you or a dead virus you know attenuated virus
17:05
produced in in ch cells or something like that and the DNA that might be in it is naked DNA and you might have a
17:13
little bit in the vaccine that’s not a problem because naked DNA gets chewed up
17:18
immediately upon vaccination and there’s no real mechanism for it to get inside to cells they inappropriately applied
17:25
that regulatory limit to this new kind of seene where everything is encapsulated in this lipid nanoparticle
17:31
it’s basically packaged in a synthetic virus able to dump its contents into a cell so I’m thinking handlon razor here
17:40
okay I don’t think there was anything nefarious here I think it was just kind of a dumb oversight and it’s going to
17:47
take because the financial incentives are so great to just you know sweep it under the rug and the career incentives
17:53
of people that approved this are going to be there’s nothing wrong here you know it’s going to take some encouragement to make people prove that
18:00
it’s okay but I really believe this was an inappropriate application of an old
18:07
school regulation to a new kind of vaccine and who knows maybe we’ll check a bunch of people and we’ll find out for
18:13
sure that this is indeed not a problem and that will do the public good if we prove that Mr
18:19
chairman Senator
18:25
cash Dr we uh appreciate all that you’re saying
18:32
although we don’t understand most of what you’re saying sorry I have a limited amount of time someone down
18:37
there agreeing a lot so you must have been a chemistry major or something but
18:44
um what what is going to help us is to know what what you can do like checking
18:49
a bunch of vaccinated people of course that’s what I can do right but we are
18:56
are not going to have any authority over the FDA to force fizer to do something I
19:04
mean that’s a federal issue uh yes unless you can explain to me how we
19:09
could do something at a state level you know some of this is going to have to be taken up by our Congressman right so
19:17
just and whatever your remaining comments are just keep in mind that I understand what what we can do and and
19:24
really these technical things you’re throwing out us as as a senator from Green has already mentioned we’re going to throw right back at you because
19:31
there’s no you’re the expert so if someone’s going to do this testing uh I don’t know who we would
19:37
find to do it well other than someone like you I can do it lots of other people can do it um I’ve had a lot of of
19:45
um so coroners and pharmacists from different states contact me I posted all
19:50
this on Twitter right and so people will private message me and say I’d like to send you some samples and then they say
19:56
oops State leg regulation will not allow our coroner to send any samples for this so there are some policy
20:03
issues that can allow this to happen or impede it I don’t know what they are but
20:09
I hear that there are mechanisms in place that will you know you can
20:16
encourage people to do things or not do things but that’s your wheelhouse not mine all I can tell you is what I found
20:23
in the lab and the scientific implications of it the policy implic and what to do it is out of my it’s above my
20:30
pay grade Senator Garrett thank you for coming today um I think I followed most
20:37
of what you said President Biden said the other day that there was a new coid vaccine that and this one really
20:44
works um there’s no evidence to that as far as I can tell I I understand that and that’s why I’m asking this question
20:51
is there some way you could get a hold of one of those and do the do the same study that you did on these vials to
20:57
make sure that we’re not using that that DNA protein or whatever it is the DNA that
21:03
that that we don’t need in to be injected into these uh to our constituents I would like to do that and
21:10
I will not get it unless I get a batch and and find out that it’s free of DNA and then I’ll take it myself but I don’t
21:16
I don’t have any way of compelling that to happen so it was just basically a way to save money by by doing it in such
21:22
volume that way without then taking it back out later on
21:30
I think nobody thought about it I I think it was reasonable to use the eoli to blow up the plasma to make the stuff
21:37
and then the the pieces of the DNA are of a very uniform and small size that’s
21:44
evidence that they took efforts to try to chop it up and then they knew about it yeah yeah
21:50
they knew it and they took efforts to chop it up they just didn’t get it all out but but having said that I guess
21:57
that they just didn’t didn’t think about the the hazard for genome modification cuz it’s not all that expensive to add
22:03
another process to get it out well that’s what I’m saying it it you know I can’t get inside their
22:10
mind rushed too much and that’s why I’m saying these subsequent you know we’ve heard testimony these subsequent you
22:15
know variant subsequent boosters etc etc are leading to maybe not scientific yet
22:23
but at least collateral knowledge that it apparently these things are causing death and disability later on and also
22:31
the aging process which you heard about a few minut there’s a lot of suspicious associations but I but it seems to me
22:37
that that before we can in South Carolina you know give this new vaccine
22:43
a world around here seems to me that that our people ought to be able to look at that Mr chairman and see whether or
22:50
not it’s got this DNA and if it does fine tell everybody that’s got the DNA and the and the problems associated
22:56
there with then you got informed consent correct okay but without that we don’t haveed I’m not I’m not really happy
23:03
about that Mr chairman and do what I can to try to help knowing what I otherwise
23:09
knowing what I know now about this I would still have recommended it to my elderly parents okay but I probably
23:16
would not have given it to my daughters okay and I I feel like my consent was not as informed as it should have been
23:23
thank you yeah represent Morgan I almost don’t know where to start I’m I’m trying
23:29
not to talk because we’re it’s a hearing and we want to hear you but you have made so many questions come to my mind
23:36
um and one I should know but I don’t remember what percentage of vaccinated people had this kind of vaccination do
23:42
you know off the top of your head like the majority of people that took the vaccine have this type because weren’t there multiple types of vaccinations you
23:48
could take the vast majority of people got either fiser or Mna and and we’re talking about the F I’m talking about
23:54
fizer my colleagues have looked at madna and it’s in madna 2o in the few that we’ve looked at it’s just not quite as
24:01
high okay wow um with so you were here today and you’ve come to present and you
24:07
notice this where could you have gone if we didn’t have this kind of ad hoc hearing for this to come Twitter so
24:14
there’s no deck there’s no way for you even at your level of expertise to say
24:20
hey red flag I I email I emailed the FDA and I tweeted at them that’s about the
24:26
extent of my resources it’s just fascinating to me that in a in the state that we don’t have some kind
24:32
of um I guess it goes to kind of the entire thing that we’re talking about is that our state agency should have more
24:40
focus on our citizens health and you know great CDC can send us stuff but we’ll make the decision and and there
24:46
should be a way for especially at your level to get input to dhack when you
24:52
notice something like this immediately and say hey deck you should consider this and then they can come and tell us
24:57
immediately hey we need to get authorization you need to change this regulation to look into this and it just seems like we’
25:03
totally dropped the ball in every direction with the state prioritizing um
25:08
you know our decision- making on this kind of stuff and and investigating into it just letting the you know the federal
25:13
government take it and do a terrible job so I had a lot of experience with DC rolling out the saliva test okay so we
25:21
invented the saliva test and then we had to deal with DEC to try to get it rolled out for the state and it appear appear
25:27
to me that they were just overrun they weren’t prepared for what
25:33
this pandemic was through there’s no fault of theirs I thought I I told people at the time that I felt like
25:40
these were Hobbits in the Shire that were you know accustomed to take care of small problems and now of a sudden we’re
25:45
in the war of the ring and there are Orcs at the gate and we’re expecting them to deal with this tremendous
25:50
Challenge and that’s not who we put there and that’s not their fault I mean
25:55
it’s just we were not prepared to handle something of this magnitude so some amount of Grace I think is appropriate
26:02
even though we could do better next time by beefing up who’s guarding the gates if you if you had a tomorrow fixes to
26:10
the system what would they be that we could I mean since you lived it and and
26:17
saw based on the research should we have somebody actually checking up especially on something that is being pushed
26:23
Statewide I mean State resources are being used saying to take this vaccine to hire people that are qualified to
26:29
tell the feds no and that’s not what we do here usually in South Carolina we hire people
26:37
sometimes we say to the no to the feds just to be ordinary because that’s our culture in South Carolina but many times
26:42
we say well I don’t know what do other people do and we hire people all over that they ask well what does Clemson do
26:49
what does USC well what do they do over in this other state instead of putting people in place that we would have
26:55
confidence in saying no to the to whatever the recommendations were we put
27:01
people in that we often encourage them to not make too many waves and just go
27:08
ask the feds what they’re doing and that’s not their fault that’s the culture that we cultivated so I know that South Carolina
27:15
culture is no no no we’re going to do our own thing but in reality in terms of actually doing stuff almost always we
27:22
people will say well what do they do else in another state or what are they doing at the FED level and I’ll just go
27:28
along with it would it be and I’m not a medical professional by any stretch would it be realistic for anything that
27:36
is being promoted especially on a large scale a vaccination that’s you know coming from who knows where to have it
27:44
be investigated by people in our state such as yourself or is that would that be too it it was reasonable to trust the
27:51
FDA even though I have my doubts about their independence now
27:58
everybody just trusted the feds to do this and at the time that was kind of
28:03
reasonable but going forward I get that’s my question going forward is it is it possible is it reasonable for us
28:09
to be able to have a system where we could especially if it’s being if the taxpayer money is going to be used to
28:14
push it and tell people to get it that we have it set up that it’s automatically tested basically or looked
28:20
into by scientists and medical professionals in our state to determine maybe it’s in DEC maybe DEC has that
28:27
where they are required to look into it and have their own um you know summary
28:32
or decision on whether or not it’s safe and effective since we know that CDC and uh FDA and all these are not doing a
28:37
good job with it and I and I guess I’m asking you as a professional are do you hear that and think wow that’s going to cost an insane amount of money and good
28:44
luck or like no that’s reasonable no no the the actual like scientific experiments are I don’t think an insane
28:51
amount of money it’s having the the Regulatory and and Financial
28:58
Independence to like say no we’re not going to do it the way we’re told until we find out that it’s okay when in
29:04
reality much of our support comes from federal sources it’s like if you have a
29:10
better idea for how to build the interstate you kind of have to do what the the federal people tell you
29:16
regardless right we because that’s where the money comes from for a lot of the in Interstate infrastructure and I think
29:23
I’m not a policy expert but I I think that a lot of financial support through
29:28
the Health Care system and and elsewhere was tied to compliance to the federal
29:34
narratives and so I don’t know that you can create true Independence you you could maybe create
29:42
some kind of oversite that would enhance the public trust in whether it was a good idea or
29:48
not but that’s a different matter from us being able to go our own way all the time but that’s your that’s your leader
29:56
that’s your area of expertise it’s not mine yeah but it is but it is possible to have somebody look into vaccinations
30:02
and do similarly to what you did on this I did this on my own money with free student I mean yeah we this is not
30:08
terribly expensive to do these kinds of tests but you know that has to be in a
30:14
system that that professors are not going to be penalized for producing results that are counter to what the
30:21
party line is supposed to be and that you can create bubbles of
30:27
where the protection for people whose job it is to check things and if they come up with answers that nobody likes
30:33
they can still say them and and you have to create these kind of protection
30:39
bubbles chairman yes ask him just a few more questions
30:44
okay doctor if you are you planning to publish these findings have you tried to
30:49
publish these findings in a journal no and no they’re
30:56
not as of now they are interesting and concerning but not they don’t rise to
31:03
the level of a peer-reviewed publication the most likely the best
31:09
possible outcome would be that I would check a bunch of people find out it never integrated and this is not a
31:16
problem and then it will never be published because papers don’t publish negative results kind of the worst
31:21
outcome is I can check a bunch of people and I find ow it integrated and it’s
31:26
called these horrible things and yeah then I’ll get a paper and be famous um but I’m hoping that that’s not
31:33
the way it goes so you see how they’re in Academia for publication there are all these perverse incentives in place
31:38
where the kind of thing you need to be done is is the kind of thing that does not
31:45
generate a publication you need a regulatory body to check find no problem and tell the public there’s no problem
31:52
we checked and there ain’t nothing there that will never get published you know or very sell it’s it’s hard to publish
31:57
negative results like that and that’s why academic science is not the best place to do
32:02
it how long would it take to do what it is you’re talking about here about check
32:08
a bunch of vaccinated people I mean I it’s it’s hard for me listening to all
32:13
this for the first time to to uh calculate how alarmed you are and
32:19
whether in your personal opinion you would hit the pause button on allowing this new vaccine so to speak without
32:27
knowing more how long’s it take and and how
32:32
serious is it to to find out this information before people keep taking these
32:38
vaccines it it takes about 3 hours to
32:43
check a vial a vaccine to see if it’s got this in it about a hundred bucks of
32:53
reagents and I’m not going to get it unless I find a a vial that I can check
32:59
ahead of time and make sure it’s not there and if it is there I’ll take a pass on
33:07
it thank you doc Dr bof thank you so much for being here and I would like to
33:12
say that um I would sort of in the world of coid that we’ve been dealing with with all the lies and coverups and
33:21
misinformation out there I would almost call you a whistleblower um and Dr lead I think we
33:27
may have found our state’s Surgeon General here no that’s not my thank thank you for
33:33
your confidence in me but that’s be would like to say is as we wrap it up is I do appreciate you um I understand um
33:40
where you are employed and um you and I have had a little conversation about how wonderful
33:46
tenure is and things like that but if you experience any retribution or any
33:53
harassment for coming forward at this hearing and testifying would you please let us know because I
33:59
can assure you you will have an army behind you to help with whatever may come your way thank you very
34:07
much rep Morgan has one more question and we’ve got to move along Dr jansy is
34:12
I think under a time constraint I should have asked this so you didn’t uh have you haven’t interacted with DEC about
34:18
this specific okay I was just wondering if you had any I interacted with some a couple of people at the FDA I just sent
34:25
them emails and said hey you want you should look in this okay okay thank you so much um next is Dr jansy Lindsay
0:00
FDA I just sent them emails and said hey
0:03
you want to you should look in this okay
0:05
okay so much next is Dr Jancy Lindsay I
0:10
hope you can
0:14
yes
0:17
many scientists
0:24
would do it I spoke at the U.S Senate in
0:26
December of 200 uh
0:29
22 about the risk of this being passed
0:33
to our children because of it being
0:35
reverse transcribed simply from the RNA
0:38
before we knew that there was DNA in the
0:42
shots as soon as I found out there was
0:44
DNA in the shots I went all over every
0:47
social media
0:49
platform I could get to and started
0:51
ringing the alarm Bell
0:53
[Music]
0:57
exactly um don’t you don’t have to play
1:00
that at this point I have little time so
1:01
I’m going to follow up to what he said
1:03
well just show the ones the ones
1:07
so I disagree with Dr buckholson that I
1:10
think that this is the most dangerous
1:11
platform that has ever been released on
1:14
mankind
1:16
um that is very easy to see in the
1:18
ferris database where you have more
1:20
deaths in just the couple months after
1:24
the rollout than you have in the past 30
1:25
years for all the other vaccines
1:27
combined
1:29
um you would have to shrink that and go
1:31
up
1:33
so there we go
1:35
[Music]
1:40
this is
1:41
what happened sorry and this is what
1:44
happened during covid
1:47
to deaths from vaccines do you see we’re
1:51
at over 35 000 deaths typically you
1:53
would get no more than 200 deaths in a
1:57
year for all 30 vaccine or for all of
2:00
the vaccines combined
2:02
this is the past 30 years of deaths from
2:05
vaccines reported into the Veris
2:07
database you’ve already heard earlier
2:08
that this represents only one to 13
2:11
percent of the cases that are normally
2:14
reported
2:15
this is a safety signal
2:18
this is a safety signal this is the
2:20
platform itself okay in the clinical
2:23
trials we saw deaths we definitely had
2:26
deaths
2:27
that was used in process one without the
2:30
contamination okay what may not have
2:33
been clear is that the the shots tested
2:36
on the people in the clinical trials
2:38
were vastly different than the shots
2:40
tested or given to people released on
2:43
the population
2:45
um I’m short on time so I’m trying to
2:46
fit this in basically people were given
2:49
in the clinical trial a clean shot
2:51
people everybody else was given these
2:54
contaminated shots every single file
2:56
that’s been tested by every scientist
2:58
around the world is contaminated with
3:01
these plasmids
3:02
and there can just some are contaminated
3:04
when when Kevin mckernan first tested
3:07
the vials he found that one of the vials
3:11
contained up to about 30 percent uh of
3:15
the nucleic acid material was in fact
3:17
DNA so this is not some residual
3:19
contamination that’s carrying over this
3:21
is significant contamination why does
3:23
that matter gene therapy was never
3:26
brought to Market even though it’s been
3:27
over 40 years in development because in
3:30
the past it caused latent cancers that
3:33
developed two to four years after these
3:35
were given because it caused lethal
3:38
autoimmune reactions even when you were
3:41
producing human proteins not viral
3:44
proteins not bacterial proteins that you
3:47
are displaying on the surface of your
3:48
cells
3:49
think about the logic of this in
3:52
traditional Gene Therapies in these are
3:54
Gene therapies they would be classified
3:56
as Gene Therapies in traditional Gene
3:58
Therapies you send in a genetic message
4:01
to make a missing protein that protein
4:05
is identical to the protein that should
4:08
have been in your body but you’re
4:10
missing
4:11
this time we’re sending in a sequence
4:13
and asking it to make a piece of a viral
4:17
protein and we’re displaying it on our
4:19
cells and then our body is attacking it
4:23
and killing those cells
4:25
it doesn’t stay in your arm they said it
4:27
would stay in your arm it goes to every
4:29
single cell in your body every tissue in
4:31
your body it goes to your brain it goes
4:33
to your bone marrow
4:35
where then your body is able to attack
4:38
these cells
4:40
it is not a healthy platform for this
4:43
there’s a difference between using this
4:45
technology for cancer or for fixing
4:48
inborn errors and Metabolism as compared
4:51
to using it in a vaccine there you
4:54
understand the risk here the risks were
4:57
not told to people
4:59
with this DNA being present what Philip
5:02
did not touch on is that there are
5:03
sequences Within These plasmids I
5:05
personally feel that this is an
5:08
intentional
5:10
um I believe that there is nefarious
5:12
intent I’m going to tell you why and
5:13
it’s something that he didn’t touch on
5:15
uh their sv40 sequences
5:20
excuse me there are there are sv40
5:23
sequences within the plasmids that were
5:25
not disclosed to The Regulators
5:27
the sv40 sequences if you’ll recall the
5:30
sv40 virus was a contaminant of the
5:34
polio vaccines
5:36
it is thought that that contamination of
5:38
the virus which is on oncogenic caused
5:41
many of the cancers for the next several
5:43
decades from the people in the people
5:45
that receive these vaccines now the
5:48
whole the whole sv40 virus is not in the
5:52
shots but what is in the shots is a
5:54
special sequence it’s called a nuclear
5:56
localization sequence which is in the
5:59
shots to take the plasma DNA directly to
6:03
the nucleus of human cells it is not
6:06
needed to grow these in bacteria you
6:09
would not have to use this to grow it in
6:12
bacteria for the purpose that they said
6:14
it was for to make lots of copies
6:18
this sequence takes the DNA to the
6:21
nucleus of human cells
6:24
where it can then be integrated or where
6:27
as Philip said it is most likely to be
6:29
integrated so all this about there’s no
6:32
DNA in the shots they will not go to the
6:35
nucleus they will not integrate with
6:37
your DNA is not true and they knew it
6:39
from the beginning because they knew the
6:41
plasmids were there
6:43
that’s a problem there’s also an sv40
6:46
promoter only designed to be expressed
6:49
in human cells not bacteria cells
6:53
now Philip has checked in something he
6:55
didn’t say which is good news for people
6:58
Dr Buchholz I keep saying Philip which
7:01
is good news for people
7:03
is that most of the sequences were
7:04
broken had they been intact and if there
7:07
are any that are intact and this is
7:09
something he should have said we have to
7:10
check
7:11
they can infect the E coli in your gut
7:14
that’s what they’re designed to do to
7:16
infect the Eco to to infect E coli which
7:18
means you can be a Perpetual Spike
7:20
Factory because they’re self-replicating
7:22
and they would self-replicate in the
7:25
bacteria of your gut and then make Spike
7:28
over and over and over again
7:31
that’s a problem they also carry an
7:33
antibiotic resistant Gene cassette to
7:36
canomyosin and neomyosin canamycin is
7:39
the main antibiotic used to treat
7:40
tuberculosis
7:42
neomycin is another antibiotic that’s
7:44
widely used
7:46
people that receive these if it
7:48
transfects the E coli in your gut it can
7:51
make the your gut and other bacteria not
7:55
just that it can make them resistant to
7:58
those antibiotics
8:00
that is a huge huge risk
8:04
um and it’s something that’s known for
8:05
plasmids it’s something that they’ve
8:07
they’re careful to make sure that you
8:09
don’t have these antibiotic resistance
8:11
genes if they’re making something that
8:14
should go into gene therapy and now it’s
8:16
here now it’s present
8:19
I’ve worked for several months to try to
8:21
get these shots recalled completely
8:23
recalled they’re dangerous excuse me I
8:26
need to get a drink of water but
8:28
um they’re dangerous we’re injecting
8:30
these in our kids we don’t inject
8:32
contaminated medical products in our
8:34
kids something Dr buckholtz didn’t touch
8:37
on as well is if there’s that much
8:39
plasmid in the shots there’s a very good
8:41
chance that there’s bacterial endotoxin
8:43
in the shots which means bacterial
8:45
proteins which can cause anaphylaxis and
8:48
even death and that may be what caused
8:51
some of the the rapid deaths that
8:53
occurred right after people got these
8:55
shots
8:56
um there’s so much more to touch on
8:58
we’ve seen massive cases of miscarriage
9:01
and stillbirth normally during years we
9:03
wouldn’t see more than 25 cases of
9:07
miscarriage
9:09
or stillbirth for all the vaccines
9:11
combined in 2021 we saw
9:15
3428 cases of stillbirth and miscarriage
9:18
reported into the bear system remember
9:20
no more than than 25 typically in a year
9:23
is normal for all the vaccines combined
9:27
um
9:28
3428 and 221 in 222 we saw 1525
9:33
stillbirth and miscarriage
9:34
and in halfway through that year the FDA
9:38
or the CDC said they would stop
9:40
reporting on uh they would stop making
9:45
all their information public because
9:46
they did not want to encourage
9:49
vaccine hesitancy or misinformation or
9:53
misinterpret misinterpretation of the
9:56
data so all of a sudden we saw what was
9:59
what was going like this go like this in
10:01
February that’s artificial we can’t even
10:04
trust the data coming out of the the CDC
10:07
anymore the FDA the FDA knows about this
10:11
contamination they’re not doing anything
10:14
um
10:16
I’m sorry this is so rushed I just
10:18
wanted to address what Dr buckholtz was
10:20
not able to he and I have the same
10:22
degrees
10:24
um I have a degree in Biochemistry and
10:26
molecular biology and I’m a toxicologist
10:29
and an expert witness as a profession
10:32
nationally and internationally this is
10:35
outrageous
10:36
I’ve never seen anything like this in my
10:38
entire career we have got to pull these
10:42
shots and restrict them from our
10:44
children we cannot inject these into
10:46
babies and children
10:48
these are contaminated dangerous lethal
10:52
products I don’t agree with Dr buckholtz
10:55
but
10:57
I believe that he’s just seeing a lot of
11:00
this data
11:03
um I feel like he is where we were three
11:05
years ago
11:08
so
11:11
that’s basically if I don’t leave now I
11:14
won’t catch my plane I may not catch it
11:17
anyway
11:18
so
11:20
you had said earlier nefarious
11:23
you felt like this was more nefarious
11:25
than Dr Burkholder in what sense are you
11:28
saying that
11:29
the sv40 sequences they should not be
11:31
there
11:32
they don’t need to be there to grow this
11:34
into back to grow this in bacteria I
11:36
don’t think it’s an accident they could
11:38
have chosen another plasma that did not
11:40
have the sv40 sequences if these
11:43
sequences sit above an oncogene and and
11:45
they’re promiscuous that means they are
11:48
likely to to integrate in places more
11:51
likely than other genetic inserts thank
11:54
you so much
11:56
um
11:59
then they can cause cancer insertional
12:01
mutagenesis anyway causes cancer
12:04
uh and that’s the risk that’s why gene
12:06
therapies were not brought to market for
12:08
so many years because there was a risk
12:11
of causing cancer from the social media
12:13
Genesis we never needed these
12:15
vaccines we had treatments that worked
12:19
uh one of our doctors here is going to
12:21
tell you about that hydroxychloroquine
12:23
and Ivermectin I can tell you as a
12:25
toxicologist they are not toxic there
12:28
there are some of the safest drugs you
12:30
can use
12:32
I there’s no reason once the FDA found
12:36
out about this contamination
12:38
okay and we looked to see endotoxin
12:40
levels
12:41
but they’ve got them all redacted why
12:44
would you redact them if you were trying
12:46
to be transparent why would you hold the
12:48
data for 75 years all of the clinical
12:51
data
12:52
for 75 years from these if you were
12:55
trying to be transparent tell me
12:58
why
12:59
there is something very unusual going on
13:02
here that is being done differently than
13:04
it’s ever been done before we don’t give
13:07
experimental products to pregnant women
13:10
we don’t give experimental products to
13:12
babies that have a death profile like
13:16
this
13:17
it’s not done it’s never been done
13:20
before
13:21
please protect your citizens
13:24
please I am begging you to protect your
13:28
citizens we’ve got to get one state to
13:31
stand up and do the right thing
13:34
do whatever you can so that other states
13:36
will follow
13:41
thank you Dr Lindsay any questions
13:45
probably
13:47
again sorry I was a little urgent in
13:49
that um no you rescheduled my Uber twice
13:52
so it’s just very
13:55
difficult to keep this everything on
13:58
schedule with him but thank you for
14:00
staying so much thank you for staying
14:02
and thank you for presenting and we
14:04
appreciate it so much
14:08
we will be reaching out I promise
14:11
Gene who’s next uh
14:14
chairman um we
14:16
passed over to meet to meet time
14:18
obligations we passed over uh Mr
14:21
recknagel so it’s probably time to call
14:23
him up now Andrew ricknoggle
14:26
yeah now beg your pardon sir
0:00
is up been looking forward to you all
0:02
day Dr Jackson thank you for coming
0:04
thank you sir
0:05
thank you ladies and gentlemen my name
0:07
is Robert E Jackson MD I’m a family
0:09
practice physician in the upstate
0:12
I’ve been practicing family medicine for
0:14
42 and a half years
0:16
it’s been my responsibility for the last
0:18
two years to take care of patients with
0:21
post-vaccine injury and covid long-haul
0:25
I estimate that I’ve taken care of
0:27
between four and five hundred patients
0:29
affected with vaccine injury or covid
0:33
long-haul
0:34
so I’d like to share that with you
0:36
let’s see how I do this
0:39
most of this information comes from the
0:41
front line covid Critical Care Alliance
0:44
website which discusses an approach to
0:47
managing post-vaccine syndrome and covid
0:50
long-haul last updated in January of
0:53
this year
0:54
let me start with a patient illustration
0:56
which is a 61 year old white male with
0:59
myocarditis and arrhythmia he received a
1:02
covid vaccine
1:06
about a year ago he’s a pharmaceutical
1:08
rep did not want to receive the vaccine
1:11
but was compelled to by the company for
1:14
which he with which he was employed and
1:17
within two to three weeks after
1:18
receiving a Pfizer vaccine he began to
1:22
experience irregular heartbeat
1:25
The Irregular Heartbeat was so severe
1:28
that he became short of breath and began
1:30
to experience panic attacks which he had
1:33
never had before
1:34
his arrhythmia was so severe that he
1:36
would have to get up from
1:38
meetings with his Employers in his
1:42
pharmaceutical company and go outside
1:43
just so he could breathe
1:46
he would be detailing his pharmaceutical
1:49
product with the doctors and medical
1:51
offices and he would experience the
1:54
arrhythmias so bad he would have to
1:56
excuse himself and go outside
1:59
ended up having to see a cardiologist
2:02
he had stress tests he had a heart cath
2:05
cardiologist told him his absolutely
2:07
nothing wrong with you that’s been over
2:10
a year ago and he still has every day
2:13
irregular heartbeat
2:15
almost every moment of the day and he’s
2:18
driven to distraction by The Irregular
2:22
Heartbeat which started within three
2:24
weeks of receiving that Pfizer vaccine
2:27
and he’s not unusual I have lots of
2:30
patients who tell me similar stories
2:33
there’s no official definition that
2:35
exists for post-covid vaccine syndrome
2:40
CDC the FDA NIH World Health
2:43
Organization do not recognize post covid
2:46
vaccine injuries as a specific medical
2:49
condition it’s interesting because as
2:52
soon as covid
2:54
entered the scene there were definite
2:58
diagnostic codes for covid for acute
3:01
covet but although
3:04
patients have been injured by the
3:06
vaccine for over a year and a half
3:08
almost two years now there’s no definite
3:11
diagnostic code or definition for
3:14
post-vaccine injury or for covid
3:18
long-haul nevertheless as of 12 to 22
3:22
there have been over a million and a
3:24
half Adverse Events that have been
3:26
reported to open bears and as you’ve
3:29
heard said already
3:31
open Bears the reports of that are four
3:33
or five times more than actually are
3:37
reported
3:38
they’ve been 36
3:40
000 deaths multiply that by four or five
3:44
and to put that into perspective when
3:46
the swine flu vaccine was introduced
3:48
many years ago it was recalled within 90
3:52
days after 34 deaths
3:55
and yet with this vaccine there’s more
3:58
than 36 000 deaths reported to Bears and
4:01
the vaccine is still being promoted by
4:04
the CDC by our government and other
4:07
agencies 185
4:10
000 hospitalizations reported to Bears
4:12
fifteen thousand heart attacks 35
4:15
000 incidences of mild carditis and
4:18
sixty thousand patients permanently
4:21
disabled multiply those numbers by four
4:24
or five
4:26
the rate of serious Adverse Events is
4:29
about eight percent according to
4:31
multiple surveys the be safe database
4:35
which interestingly has been removed is
4:38
eight percent a pole fish survey in July
4:41
of last year eight point six four
4:43
percent
4:44
erasmussen report in December of last
4:46
year reported serious Adverse Events at
4:49
seven percent a U.S veterans survey 8.5
4:53
percent with the Pfizer vaccine 7.9
4:57
percent with the moderna vaccine what’s
5:00
causing all this it’s the spike protein
5:03
notably the S1 subunit is likely the
5:06
major pathogenetic factor leading to the
5:09
post vaccine syndrome there’s immediate
5:12
reaction which is a hypersensitivity
5:14
reaction which is not unique to the
5:17
vaccine all manner of medications and
5:20
drugs can cause an immediate
5:22
hypersensitivity reaction it’s about 2.4
5:25
percent of folks receiving this vaccine
5:28
can experience an immediate
5:29
hypersensitivity reaction
5:32
what most people are concerned with is
5:35
the acute myocarditis or sudden cardiac
5:37
death that occurs within 24 to 48 hours
5:41
that’s what you see in the media these
5:45
are the athletes that you see that
5:47
receive the vaccine and within one or
5:48
two days they’re collapsing on the ball
5:51
field or dying of a sudden cardiac event
5:53
usually an arrhythmia in years past
5:56
about 25 college or professional
6:00
athletes would die per year
6:03
worldwide on the ball field since the
6:06
rollout of these vaccines the death rate
6:09
is 25 per month worldwide and that is
6:13
shocking and we’re not seeing anything
6:15
about that in the mainstream Media or in
6:18
medical journals
6:21
it’s also due to a stress cardiomyopathy
6:24
caused by excessive catecholamines
6:26
epinephrine norepinephrine there’s a
6:29
Subacute or chronic myocarditis caused
6:31
by the spike protein-induced
6:33
inflammation and that Subacute chronic
6:36
it’s weeks or months maybe even years
6:40
later is a vaccine-related injury due to
6:43
inflammation and acute I’m sorry auto
6:46
antibodies this activating the clotting
6:49
Cascade or it may even cause viral
6:52
reactivation
6:54
the inflammatory response is mediated by
6:57
the spike protein it induces monoclonal
7:00
Cell Activation and it primarily affects
7:02
the brain the heart and the endocrine
7:05
organs
7:06
what’s the time course of sudden death
7:08
it’s either that immediate within one to
7:13
two days to 14 days and it causes is
7:17
induced by catecholamine release and
7:19
spike-induced inflammation in the heart
7:22
or and this really goes under the radar
7:25
four to six months later you see after
7:29
the last dose of the vaccine
7:31
there’s no symptoms of post-vaccine
7:34
syndrome in a lot of these patients but
7:37
then suddenly they experience sudden
7:39
death and it’s usually caused by
7:41
endothelialitis that’s inflammation of
7:43
the lining of the blood vessels and
7:45
they’re they’re experiencing blood clots
7:47
that leads to sudden death
7:50
the epidemic of sudden death I want you
7:53
to understand that the CDC data reveals
7:56
that 84 percent of these uh there’s a
8:00
there was an 84 percent Spike of excess
8:04
mortality by the third quarter of the
8:07
vaccine mandate
8:09
pay close attention between March of 21
8:12
and February of 22 there was 61
8:17
000 Millennials between the age of 25
8:19
and 44 age group that died excessively
8:23
above the prior five-year base trend
8:27
line
8:29
61
8:32
000 Millennials in that one-year span
8:36
died above the previous five-year
8:40
Baseline and Dr Jackson did you hear any
8:43
of that in the media yes sir and I think
8:46
it would be hard to attribute that to
8:48
covid seeing as how covid does not
8:51
typically kill that age group exactly
8:54
right and and get this this was after
8:57
the Delta variant this was the timing of
9:01
the Omicron variant which was much less
9:03
virulent
9:08
more Millennials died in 21 than
9:12
American soldiers died in the 10 years
9:14
of the Vietnam War most of you some of
9:18
you guys are my age and you remember the
9:20
outcry during the 10 years of the
9:23
Vietnam War when ten thousand Young
9:28
Americans died during that war
9:31
but during that last one year 61
9:35
000 Young Americans the same age as
9:38
those soldiers who died in the Vietnam
9:40
War died after the rollout of the Pfizer
9:44
and moderna vaccines
9:48
Millennials started dying in large
9:50
numbers at the same time when vaccines
9:52
and boosters were rolled out and were
9:55
made mandatory by academic institutions
9:59
and employers and the government and the
10:02
military
10:04
also at the time when the less virulent
10:06
Omicron variant was prevalent
10:10
pay attention to the United Kingdom data
10:12
in 2020 and 2021 excess pediatric
10:17
mortality was declining went down nine
10:21
percent in 2020 it went down 7 percent
10:24
and 21 but then in 2022
10:29
the United Kingdom rolled out their
10:31
vaccines for children
10:34
and the mortality went up 16 and 22.
10:39
and it’s projected in 2023 to go up by
10:42
22 percent
10:44
correlation coefficient is 0.94
10:47
suggesting a very strong positive linear
10:50
relationship between the covid vaccine
10:53
rollout and excess deaths and that data
10:57
comes from Finance technology.com
11:02
I’m going to skip some of this in an
11:03
interest time
11:06
first line therapy for treating
11:09
post-vaccine syndrome and covid by the
11:11
way is Ivermectin
11:14
moderating physical activity low-dose
11:16
Naltrexone Resveratrol melatonin 81
11:21
milligram aspirin these are some of the
11:23
treatments that I’ve used in my medical
11:25
clinic
11:26
80 percent of long-haul patients 80
11:29
percent of patients who’ve had the
11:31
vaccine experience some kind of
11:33
long-haul symptoms such as brain fog
11:37
cough muscle pain
11:40
neuropathy in the lower extremities and
11:43
excessive fatigue let me give you two
11:45
patient illustrations
11:47
one was a 50 year old legal secretary
11:49
she was up My Girl Friday for a
11:53
well-known lawyer in Spartanburg County
11:57
she came to see me and she was weeping
11:59
depressed she had not worked today for
12:02
10 months she told me Dr Jackson I don’t
12:04
even take a shower but once a week and
12:06
my husband makes me do that I can’t cook
12:09
I can’t clean I can’t walk my dog I
12:13
haven’t been to work in 10 months
12:15
she said I’ve been to two doctors so
12:17
both told me I just have to tough it out
12:19
until I get better but after she took
12:21
the vaccine it didn’t help she then got
12:24
covid and all of these symptoms
12:26
developed within a couple of weeks of
12:29
developing covid and I told her I said
12:32
ma’am don’t believe what you’ve been
12:33
told there is a treatment protocol I put
12:36
on Ivermectin put her on melatonin I
12:39
gave her prednisone for 10 days put it
12:41
on Resveratrol and quercetin she came
12:44
back to see me in a month and she told
12:46
me that in two weeks she was back to her
12:48
normal self back to work her husband was
12:52
shot her employer was shot she said all
12:54
the brain fog is gone and she said Dr
12:57
Jackson I’m back to my normal self and
13:00
she gave me a hug and she danced me in a
13:02
big circle in the exam room and she’s
13:04
been fine ever since I treated her for
13:07
three months taping her off all the
13:09
medicine and I haven’t seen her since
13:11
second one is a 76 year old grandmother
13:14
she had covid she got the vaccine which
13:18
did not help and then she got coveted
13:20
and she was on oxygen short of breath
13:23
coughing all the time so fatigued that
13:26
she couldn’t drive her car she hadn’t
13:28
been to church for 10 months almost a
13:30
year
13:31
hadn’t been to the pharmacy hadn’t been
13:33
to the drugstore she’d been going to see
13:35
a pulmonologist in town
13:38
we’ve been giving her a cortisone
13:39
inhaler plus the oxygen and she was just
13:43
not any better when she came to see me I
13:45
said man we can get you better put it on
13:47
Ivermectin and the rest of the
13:49
medications and a budesonide nebulizer
13:51
twice a day
13:53
when she saw me two months later she
13:55
told me she said doc within two weeks I
13:58
was back to my normal self I was off
14:00
oxygen I was driving my car going to
14:03
church she went back to see the
14:05
pulmonologist who said to her why are
14:08
you taking this Ivermectin and she said
14:10
doc my family doctor put me on it and
14:13
within two weeks I was back to normal
14:15
and he’s
14:17
talked to her a little bit more and he
14:19
said again now why are you taking this
14:21
Ivermectin she said doc I don’t know
14:24
you’ll have to ask him but I’ve been
14:26
seeing you for 10 months and you hadn’t
14:28
done a darn thing for me and he put me
14:30
on this and in two weeks I was back to
14:32
my normal self so I’m here to tell you
14:34
that there are treatments for covid Long
14:37
Haul and post-vaccine syndrome but there
14:40
are a lot of positions out there that
14:42
are not aware of proper or appropriate
14:44
treatment and
14:47
there are patients out there that are
14:49
getting well characteristics of covid
14:51
long-haul prolong malaise headaches
14:54
generalized fatigue sleep difficulties
14:57
loss of taste and smell my wife’s one of
15:00
those
15:00
two years later after having kovitz she
15:03
still doesn’t smell food still doesn’t
15:05
taste food very frustrated by that
15:09
painful joints short breath chest pain
15:12
brain fog and listen I see three to five
15:16
new patients every day who come to see
15:19
me with post-vaccine syndrome or covid
15:22
long-haul some of them drive from as far
15:25
away as Wilmington North Carolina six
15:27
hour drive because they hear that
15:29
there’s a doctor that is willing and
15:31
capable to treat them for these kind of
15:33
symptoms
15:35
and I think that’s enough of that let me
15:37
conclude
15:49
the previous covid variants and the
15:52
current covid variant has a minimal
15:54
effect upon children
15:58
causing only a mild upper respiratory
16:00
infection
16:01
the only deaths among children occur in
16:04
those with a malignancy and autoimmune
16:07
illness
16:08
the vaccine does not prevent children
16:11
from Contracting the illness nor does it
16:13
prevent them from transmitting the
16:15
illness to other family members it’s
16:17
beyond me why we would take the chance
16:21
of exposing children to the increased
16:23
risk of excess mortality associated with
16:27
the vaccine
16:29
our government agencies have access to
16:32
all the data that I’ve shared with you
16:35
they are charged with protecting our
16:37
citizens but don’t seem to be raising
16:39
any alarms about the vaccine in fact
16:42
they’re promoting the vaccine for our
16:44
children and as a family physician
16:46
that’s what’s concerning me the most the
16:49
government agencies are promoting the
16:52
vaccine for children
16:55
if our government agencies do not
16:57
advocate for the children of our state
16:59
then it’s up to you as elected
17:01
representatives to protect our citizens
17:03
we cannot afford to wait a year to
17:06
collect our own statistics like the
17:08
United Kingdom has just done
17:11
by then the death rate among our
17:13
children will have increased just like
17:15
in the United Kingdom and the
17:17
responsibility will be laid at your feet
17:20
and my feet as a family doctor
17:23
to be forewarned is to be forearmed
17:27
it has been said that silence in the
17:29
face of evil is evil itself
17:32
not to speak is to speak
17:34
not to act is to act and God will not
17:38
hold us Guiltless
17:41
in the Old Testament it says that the
17:43
men of issachar understood the times
17:47
and they took action
17:49
I know this is a listening session
17:52
but there’s a time to listen
17:54
and there’s a time to take action
17:56
and all of us here are praying for you
17:58
gentlemen and ladies
18:00
that God will give you wisdom
18:03
and sound judgment
18:08
I’ve got a lot of words what I’m out of
18:11
time thank you Dr Jackson we have any
18:13
yes uh Senator I just want to thank you
18:15
I got covered and I took the album back
18:18
then you told me to take
18:20
I didn’t come to you but I heard your
18:22
testimony and I cleared up and I never
18:24
took one of those vaccinations so thank
18:26
you thank you sir thank you sir
18:28
representative
18:29
thank you Mr chairman and yeah I also
18:32
got the Ivermectin thank you very much
18:33
yes sir yes um so and and you’re the
18:36
first physician we’ve had up here that
18:38
actually kind of works in like a family
18:40
medicine or any kind of medicine type
18:42
practice and I had a pediatrician tell
18:47
me that basically
18:48
they they had to achieve certain
18:52
vaccination rates among their patients
18:55
they do or they were going to be uh I
18:58
don’t know if it was uh some kind of a
18:59
financial
19:00
incentive or or disincentive to them
19:03
that basically and this was a
19:04
pediatrician so obviously there’s a lot
19:05
more child vaccinations I didn’t know if
19:08
you were familiar if that there was some
19:11
sort of a a way that the hospital
19:14
systems uh track those sorts of things
19:16
what those incentives might be is it
19:19
strictly the childhood vaccinations or
19:21
do they also do that for like flu
19:23
vaccines and have they or would they do
19:25
it for covet as well all right
19:29
Physicians that are employed by Hospital
19:31
systems are incentivized financially to
19:35
give pediatric vaccines
19:38
pediatricians that are not are
19:40
incentivized by their insurance
19:43
reimbursements to reach a certain
19:45
percentage in their pediatric
19:47
populations by the insurers by Blue
19:49
Cross Blue Shield and others to reach a
19:52
certain percentage of vaccines and I
19:55
know that’s for Pediatric vaccines now
19:57
does that apply to the covid vaccine
20:00
which is now being added to the the
20:03
childhood vaccine regimen I don’t know
20:05
the answer to that yet but it’s a very
20:07
good question
20:12
okay
20:13
yes representative Davis
20:16
thank you thank you for being with us
20:18
this afternoon and sticking with us for
20:21
the other testimony I had a couple of
20:23
questions number one why are doctors
20:27
reluctant to treat
20:30
with some of the medicines that you’re
20:31
using to treat long covered
20:33
um
20:35
it’s a sticky question okay most
20:38
Physicians
20:40
um
20:41
you call them front line doctors family
20:43
doctors internists
20:45
ER doctors are employed by Hospital
20:48
systems
20:50
Hospital Systems in this state get their
20:53
marching orders from the federal
20:54
government
20:55
federal government issued protocols in
20:58
the beginning that said that certain
21:00
medications were taboo like Ivermectin
21:03
and hydroxychloroquine
21:05
and they promoted the vaccines
21:08
so doctors like I’m employed by a
21:11
hospital system and so I received a
21:14
little subtle note from my hospital that
21:17
I should not be prescribing I remected
21:20
now I just told them they needed to
21:22
stick to Administration and I would
21:24
stick to prescribing and treating
21:25
patients so that really didn’t go
21:28
anywhere
21:29
but there are others who
21:32
listen to their hospital system now
21:35
Hospital Systems get 50 of their funding
21:37
from the federal government so when the
21:40
federal government says no Ivermectin no
21:43
hydroxychloroquine then they listened
21:46
and they put the squeeze on their
21:48
Physicians and Physicians they have
21:50
mortgages and children going to college
21:52
and car payments and so in the hospital
21:55
says no Ivermectin they listen you
21:57
understand that pressure
22:00
at the same time
22:02
the FDA who’s not a physician does not
22:06
treat patients with saying Hey Y’all
22:09
Ivermectin is a horse paste y’all
22:11
shouldn’t be taking that that’s
22:13
propaganda you understand that and that
22:16
and a federal judge in Louisiana just
22:18
last week
22:20
said that the FDA overstepped its bounds
22:23
and the FDA is not a physician and
22:26
should not be given advice like that
22:29
well
22:30
directives like that to Physicians they
22:32
can advise but they cannot command and
22:35
they overstep their Authority in doing
22:38
things like that and so in answer to
22:42
your question there were a lot of
22:43
pressure on Physicians now the other
22:45
thing is a lot of fishing Physicians are
22:47
not what I call covid literate in
22:50
treating covid long-haul or post-vaccine
22:53
syndrome they’re just not making
22:55
themselves available of the information
22:57
on how to treat it post-vaccine syndrome
23:00
covid long-haul is new a lot of this
23:03
stuff is new and if doctors aren’t
23:06
availing themselves of the information
23:07
they just don’t know how and I have
23:10
Physicians calling me and asking how how
23:12
are you treating these people and what
23:14
works and what doesn’t work
23:17
do you know if the FDA has considered
23:21
doing a series of studies on the
23:24
effectiveness of those medications
23:27
there’s been no prospective or
23:30
randomized control studies on
23:31
post-vaccine syndrome or covid long-haul
23:35
okay thank you and then also
23:39
um
23:41
the the testimony that we heard earlier
23:45
today about there being DNA in these
23:49
vaccines
23:50
is that directly related to
23:54
these incidences of long covid yes ma’am
23:57
I’m convinced that it is okay and now
24:00
the spike protein I think is is the main
24:03
inflammatory agent but I I don’t know
24:07
what the DNA
24:09
contaminant is doing to my patients and
24:12
that that needs to be researched and my
24:16
advice to my patient is don’t take the
24:18
vaccine because I don’t know what it’s
24:19
doing to my patients
24:21
and I I’m I’m alarmed by that in fact
24:24
I’ll be honest in the very beginning all
24:27
of my medical career have always told my
24:30
patients do not take a new medication or
24:33
vaccine until it’s been on the year for
24:35
on the market for a year
24:38
because I’ve seen too many things pulled
24:41
off the market within the first year
24:43
and so when this vaccine came out my
24:46
patients asked me should I take it and I
24:47
said absolutely not do not take it until
24:50
it’s been on the market for a year
24:52
and within the first six months we
24:54
started seeing the reports of serious
24:56
Adverse Events and I felt Vindicated in
25:00
telling my patients don’t take it and
25:03
and so they kept coming back to me and
25:05
saying should I take it and I kept
25:06
saying no no don’t
25:08
and you see now the wisdom in that
25:12
okay thank you yes ma’am I appreciate it
25:15
any other questions for Dr Jackson Dr
25:18
Jackson I just had one you seem to be
25:21
way ahead of the curve with prescribing
25:24
Ivermectin Hydrochloric and the things
25:26
that we all now know work and I remember
25:28
serving on Senator Martin’s committee
25:30
two years ago I believe it was in
25:32
September
25:33
two years ago I mean you were under a
25:36
tremendous amount of
25:38
pressure or heat from the hospital
25:40
system and basically you turned around
25:43
and told them what they could do with it
25:45
but um has that come to an end they
25:49
they’re pretty well leaving you alone
25:50
now the hospital system doesn’t bother
25:53
me but I still cannot get a pharmacy to
25:56
prescribe Ivermectin a chain Pharmacy
25:59
I have to go through compounding
26:01
pharmacies and insurance companies will
26:05
not pay for Ivermectin my patients have
26:07
to pay cash for their Ivermectin is over
26:09
140 dollars for a month’s Supply
26:12
and you know three to five patients a
26:15
day are coming to me for covid long-haul
26:18
treatment and they all have to pay cash
26:20
for their Ivermectin and that’s not fair
26:23
it’s not right
26:25
would
26:27
Ivermectin is used to treat other things
26:30
other than covet I mean use it to treat
26:32
parasitic infections right we treat it
26:35
treat all manner of things is that
26:37
what’s used to treat say if you drink
26:39
bad water from a creek or something you
26:41
got Giardia or
26:43
what’s the other intestinal parasite
26:45
that makes you really sick is I remaking
26:47
how you treat for that not not for
26:49
giardia I mean it might but that’s not
26:52
what I would use for giardia no sir okay
26:54
um but it but it does treat all manner
26:57
of other things I wonder if the
26:59
insurance company pay
27:01
for it if it was used to treat other
27:04
things yes
27:06
diagnosis is something else they would
27:08
pay for it but if the diagnosis is
27:10
recovered they won’t well that’s
27:12
interesting okay
27:16
thank you Amy uh I any other question Dr
27:20
Jackson thank you so much for driving
27:22
down and taking time out of your day
27:24
it’s always a joy to hear from you thank
27:25
you so much for presenting all right
27:27
thank you kindly Lord bless you one and
27:29
all thank you thank you Mr chairman next
27:32
up we have Dr Matt Clark and I’m doing
27:36
double duty so I’m going to run full of
27:38
Christmas
27:43
Dr Clark why are you coming I just want
27:45
to thank you for for presenting and um
27:47
can we ask questions along the way if
27:49
need do or you want us to wait to the
27:51
end
27:52
yes sir I would just say that my answer
27:54
is the same as the other fellow okay as
27:56
long as the time restraints are a little
27:57
bit looser because I got a lot to say I
27:59
probably put too much in my presentation
28:01
okay